I get the same result, thank You for Your help :)
I seem to get the "expected" result when I set the Height and Width to "unequal to" vs. the intuitive setting of "equal to" in the Callas check.
OK, so meaby some workaround?
Im trying to check it by Callas (to create a .kfpx for Core preflight profile) but when I do this:
and the file is 90x50mm i have "no problems" and it should becouse variable is 92 not 90 as trimbox in this file:
I have recreated the problem and have written a BUG against it. Feel free to contact Xerox support for the raising of a problem report.
I want to do this:
And I have noticed that when I save this node and reopen it it is like that:
Notice that the secound with is changed to "$FFwfdoc.Subject$ - 0.1" and it should be "$FFwfdoc.Author$ + 0.1"
Can you provide me with an example (e.g., ffc file/screensnap) of what you are trying to accomplish? I am having trouble following the formula you are trying.
The tolerance is +\- 1.5 mm.
OK, so I have another problem, what is tolerance in "Check Width and Height"?
When I choose "is equal to" and for example give 40mm in trimbox width and 41mm in variable - the result is not an preflight error. It is wrong becouse 40mm isnt equal to 41mm. When i give 42mm in variable there is a preflight error (so it is working OK).
I have tryied to do "fit between" but when I was trying to substarct 0.1 mm in first variable and add 0.1 mm in secound (after "And") it couses an error.
OK, I have figured it out, it was bad Routing node.