Invalid input string format

[barwapk]

I get the same result, thank You for Your help :)

[DavidU54339-XRX]

I seem to get the "expected" result when I set the Height and Width to "unequal to" vs. the intuitive setting of "equal to" in the Callas check.

[barwapk]

OK, so meaby some workaround?

Im trying to check it by Callas (to create a .kfpx for Core preflight profile)  but when I do this:

https://ibb.co/9HPVb9y

and the file is 90x50mm i have "no problems" and it should becouse variable is 92 not 90 as trimbox in this file:

https://ibb.co/jh1DwD3

[DavidU54339-XRX]

I have recreated the problem and have written a BUG against it. Feel free to contact Xerox support for the raising of a problem report.

[barwapk]

I want to do this:

https://ibb.co/Ycd3Sz3

And I have noticed that when I save this node and reopen it it is like that:

https://ibb.co/wYrSPTt

Notice that the secound with is changed to "$FFwfdoc.Subject$ - 0.1" and it should be "$FFwfdoc.Author$ + 0.1"

[DavidU54339-XRX]

Can you provide me with an example (e.g., ffc file/screensnap) of what you are trying to accomplish? I am having trouble following the formula you are trying.

[barwapk]

This is unacceptable tolerance. What about useing fit between with substract and add 0.1 mm to a variable ? why it is not working?

[DavidU54339-XRX]

The tolerance is +\- 1.5 mm.

[barwapk]

OK, so I have another problem, what is tolerance in "Check Width and Height"?

When I choose "is equal to" and for example give 40mm in trimbox width and 41mm in variable - the result is not an preflight error. It is wrong becouse 40mm isnt equal to 41mm. When i give 42mm in variable there is a preflight error (so it is working OK).

I have tryied to do "fit between" but when I was trying to substarct 0.1 mm in first variable and add 0.1 mm in secound (after "And") it couses an error.

[barwapk]

OK, I have figured it out, it was bad Routing node.