cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
3 Replies
dupecoop
New Member
New Member

Re: ColorQube 8870 error 94,536.00

Hi Joe,

 

I believe my 8870 has the same problem.

 

For $50 it's worth a try.

 

Once I open the printer will it be obvious how to replace this part? Or can you provide some guidance?

 

Much appreciated.

 

John

NYC

0 Kudos
jlh
New Member
New Member

Re: ColorQube 8870 error 94,536.00

Thanks jroth,

I actually was able to get a hold of the service manual. In this manual it has me check the resistance on the Drum Temperature sensor. I have found that the drum temp sensor is not giving me any resistance. I am going to replace this part first. Then if that doesnt work I will need to check the drum assembly itself.

0 Kudos
JordanAXAUQE-AA
Agency Analyst
Agency Analyst

Re: ColorQube 8870 error 94,536.00

That error is referring to the Drum Heater being Too Hot. First thing it to make sure fans are running and none of the vents are covered up. That s the basic troubleshooting you can do. Anything more will require a technician to troubleshoot your machine for the exact cause. The fan / vent I was referring to is on the right side of the machine.

Is the room humid?
Thank you,
Jordan R.
Systems Analyst / Consultant
Fiery Certified Professional

If someone helped you make sure you give Kudos for their efforts! Don't forget to Select Accept as Solution if the reply resolved your issue as it will be able to help others!
0 Kudos
jlh
New Member
New Member

ColorQube 8870 error 94,536.00

Product Name: Other - specify product in post

Hi,

I was wondering if anyone has experienced the 94,536.00 on a ColorQube printer before. All Xerox's site has to say about it, is that it is a "temperature based problem" but does not give me any specifics. I have to turn the printer off for about 45 minutes and then it will work again for a few print jobs, but then show the error again. I have the printer in a well ventilated area and the temperature of the room is within operating temperatures.

 

Thanks,

Joe

0 Kudos