cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
4 Replies
jjjeroenski
Valued Member
Valued Member

Re: ERROR: limitcheck OFFENDING COMMAND: save WorkCenter 7545

Is this topic already solved? we have exact the same problem...

 

0 Kudos
coscript
New Member
New Member

Re: ERROR: limitcheck OFFENDING COMMAND: save WorkCenter 7545

PostScript errors cannot be investigated without a sample file. Please put it on FTP or HTTP for download

and post an URL here.

Most likely, the number of save levels exceeds a small implementation limit because of the problems with the document design or an runaway recursion.

0 Kudos
ALira
New Member
New Member

Re: ERROR: limitcheck OFFENDING COMMAND: save WorkCenter 7545

Hello,

 

Thanks for your suggestion but this doesn't seem to be the solution to our problem. We are printig from SAP and after 28 pages, we get ERRORé: limitchek OFFENDING COMMAND: save

 

any other suggestions would be appreciated.

 

Regards,

0 Kudos
CherylO-Xerox
Valued Advisor
Valued Advisor

Re: ERROR: limitcheck OFFENDING COMMAND: save WorkCenter 7545

Hi Alira,

Thank you for using the Support Forum. Please take a look at the solutions for PS errors and see if any of these help.  If you are printing from Adobe please pay special attention to solution 3.  If this does not help please consider contacting your support centre for further assistance.

Thanks,
CherylO-Xerox
Community Manager

Be sure to click Kudos for those who have helped you.
Select Accept as Solution for posts that have helped to solve your issue(s)!

0 Kudos
ALira
New Member
New Member

ERROR: limitcheck OFFENDING COMMAND: save WorkCenter 7545

Product Name: Other - specify product in post

Hello,

 

We've added WC-7545 as a Post-Script printer for SAP (printing a SAPScript); printing goes well until page 27 of the document; as for page 28, get the following error:

 

ERROR:

limitcheck (COMMAND TYPE: operatortype)

OFFENDING COMMAND:

save "save"

OPERAND STACK: (28 total entries)

 

form contains a small image (which we have removed to test printing with similar results)

 

any suggestions?

0 Kudos